Writing the master thesis was a challenge, simply because it was time consuming. But whether i felt it carried sufficiently quality is a highly debatious topic to me. Much too debatious for anyone to listen to. I didn't feel as if i really acquired a whole lot of knowledge, much less say skills.
It was just like a build-on from my Bachelor's FYP skills, and i didn't feel as if it was a giant stride forward. Is it normal to feel like this after one finish writing his thesis?
1) How much of the thesis should u take ownership for?
2) How much can a supervisor stoke your interests or steer you towards highly academically challenging thoughts and fields?
3) Could supervisors still fulfil their duties if they are supervising a topic they don't exactly have a very deep knowledge of?
take a trip and hopefully the answers will surface by themselves...
